Julian wrote:
You are aware of MNot's "Web Linking" draft (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-05.html>), and the fact that it seems to enjoy support from the TAG?
Julian, you continue to bring this up as if we hadn't already discussed this: there are significant differences of opinion with mnot on whether his interpretation of @rel values is correct in prior HTML versions, and there are a number of folks who disagree (not just us in RDFa), including at least two RECs (RDFa and GRDDL).
The point is: if you assume that @rel="foo" always means the same thing, then many folks believe you're already violating the HTML spec, which specifically uses @profile to modulate the meaning of @rel, and sometimes via another level of indirection.
-Ben
