Kornel Lesinski wrote: > Is it possible for HTML 5 spec to say that browsers may > re-send PUT without asking?
It sounds like you are starting to agree with me that topics like these could deserve a place in the HTML5 spec :-) Aryeh Gregor wrote: > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Kornel Lesinski > <[email protected]> wrote: > > You store the data on server side, and redirect to URL that > > contains unique ID for this data. > > > > It's just a few lines in PHP (and similar solutions shuold > > be possible in all web frameworks): > > > > $id = uniqid(); > > $_SESSION[$id] = $_POST; > > header("Location: [.]/result.php?id=$id",false,303); > > > > and later: > > > > $_POST = $_SESSION[$_GET['id']]; > > > > This works even for multiple submissions done in parallel > > and it's pretty > > secure and tamper-proof. > > That does seem like a pretty good solution. Perhaps Mike Wilson can > point out the problems with it. In an earlier mail I was referring to this solution as "conversation id in URL", and yes, there are drawbacks with this as well. Best regards Mike
