On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Daniel Berlin <[email protected]> wrote: [snip] >> I would, however, get in trouble for not having paid patent >> fees for doing so. > No more or less trouble than you would have gotten in had you gotten > it from ffmpeg instead of us, which combined with the fact that we do
For the avoidance of doubt, Are you stating that when an end user obtains Chrome from Google they do not receive any license to utilize the Google distributed FFMPEG code to practice the patented activities essential to H.264 and/or AAC decoding, which Google licenses for itself?
