On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:01 AM, David Gerard<[email protected]> wrote: > A spec that makes an encumbered format a "SHOULD" is unlikely to be > workable for those content providers, e.g. Wikimedia, who don't have > the money, and won't under principle, to put up stuff in a format > rendered radioactive by known enforced patents.
That's why "should" is not the same as "must". Those who have a good reason not to do it can decline to do it.
