We could make Storage into an EventTarget and also fire events on
there,
sure. As Jeremy said, this is something that might best be done in the
next version; we're still trying to get the current features
implemented
in a stable and consistent fashion as it is.
Sounds great. Although wouldn't now be the best time to introduce
something new? Its not a breaking change (theoretically), its an
additional feature. Its my understanding that most of Web Storage is
undergoing changes (B-trees and SQL orthogonally), but the Storage
interface is not going to change much? Is that because of current
browser support?
In general, though, I don't think it's critical, since you can
easily work
around it by checking which was changed based on the event data
Fair enough. =)
(I agree that your proposal would have made more sense. I'm sorry my
learning experiences have such a detrimental effect on the Web! :-) )
We're all learning. =P
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )
\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _
\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--
(,_..'`-.;.'
- Joe
