On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Anne van Kesteren<[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:47:32 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[email protected]> wrote: >> The problem is that you can't use fragment identifiers with data-URIs. >> >> For example >> >> data:text/plain,hello world#frag >> >> Represents a text/plain document with the contents: >> >> hello world#frag >> >> It does not represent the 'frag' part of a document with the text 'hello >> world'. > > Actually, I think that is false (and a bug in Firefox). At the time the data > URI RFC was written RFC 2396 was still the URI RFC and there fragment > identifiers were not a formal part of the URI syntax but rather something you > could append to any URI during retrieval operations, which is clearly what > data URIs are for.
Would be great to get clarification on that. Safari seems to behave the same (though not if you modify a fragment on a already entered uri) / Jonas
