On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Kevin Benson<kevin.m.ben...@gmail.com> wrote: > Their purpose is described later in 4.8.10.5 Loading the media > resource at step 20:
Yes, but maybe a different character could be chosen, if this one doesn't consistently display in browsers. > Sentence #1 Recommends unobtrusive implementation of UI features (for > author's sake). > Sentence #2 Permits override of boolean attribute for implementation > of UI features. (for UA's sake) But ends with a colon, which together with "the following" suggests a list of some sort was meant to come after it. > Sentence #3 Recommends unobtrusive implementation of UI features (for > client's sake). Which duplicates sentence #1, even though that was only two sentences before. So again it looks to me like there was originally something in between that made this look less redundant. As it stands it definitely reads strangely to me, anyway. (I looked in the version history, but it didn't explain much. The paragraph was added as-is in r678 commented out, then uncommented in r697.)