On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Darin Fisher<da...@chromium.org> wrote: > > I agree. Moreover, since a shared worker identified by a given name > cannot > > be "navigated" elsewhere, the name isn't all that synonymous with other > > usages of names (e.g., window.open). At the very least, it would seem > > helpful to scope the name to the URL to avoid the name conflict issue. > > -Darin > > Technically, that can already be done by using the current the current > URL as the name. I don't quite understand. Are you suggesting that you can work around this by passing the same parameter twice when creating a shared worker? If so, that seems ugly...and a sign that it should be changed.