On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:55:50 +0100, Ian Hickson <[email protected]> wrote:
A widget.
Although the spec specifically mentions widgets that can be reused, I
haven't
been able to find any use cases of this yet. I don't that <article> is
an
element name that readily springs to mind for developers publishing
widgets.
The widgets on iGoogle are an example.
[snip]
* The use case of marking up application widgets with <article>
stretches the definition and makes it hard to come up with a good
criteria for <article>.
I think it's the same concept -- a self-contained blob of reusable
content.
Oops. I'd just said on html5 doctor that I would mark those up with
<section>.
http://html5doctor.com/the-section-element/comment-page-1/#comment-1107
Each widget might be re-usable, but is it (coining new word:) syndicatable?
Are re-usable and syndicatable synonymous?
b
