On Oct 5, 2009, at 10:40 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
For example, see Google Gadgets
<http://www.google.com/webmasters/gadgets/>, or iframe sandboxes used
for isolating untrusted content while still being inline in the page.
Yes, if we add doc="" support to <iframe> maybe that would make this
case
common enough that we should reconsider.
I had to look up what doc="" meant, so for the edification of others,
the proposal is here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2008May/0326.html
So, my recommendation is that <title> be made optional; perhaps a
validator could issue a warning if you leave it off, but there are
perfectly valid cases of wanting to produce an HTML document that
doesn't have any sort of meaningful title or for which a title will
never be seen or used, it doesn't seem likely that people will
forget it
in cases in which it's useful,
I think this is something we should revisit in a future version. I'm
not
convinced we're at a stage yet where there are enough non-standalone
HTML
pages that it makes sense to not require <title> for any pages.
Changing
something this fundamental can have social repurcussions in the
community
that aren't obvious (e.g. old timers saying we're ruining HTML4),
and I
feel that we've done enough of that already with HTML5 without
changing
this also, frankly.
Fair enough. I can definitely see the value in that argument.
-- Brian