Of course :-). Thanks a lot, Geoffrey!

-Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: Geoffrey Sneddon [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 8:59 AM
To: Matt Hall
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Character casing for "Appropriate End Tags" and the 
"temporary buffer"

Matt Hall wrote:
> Apologies for the repost -- here is the original e-mail in plain text:
> 
> 
> Prior to r4177, the matching of tag names for exiting the RCDATA/RAWTEXT 
> states was done as follows:
> 
> "...and the next few characters do no match the tag name of the last start 
> tag token emitted (compared in an ASCII case-insensitive manner)"
> 
> However, the current revision doesn't include any comment on character casing 
> in its discussion of "Appropriate End Tags."  Similarly, certain tokenizer 
> states require that you check the contents of the "temporary buffer" against 
> the string "script" but there is no indication of whether or not to do this 
> in a case-insensitive manner.
> 
> In both cases, should this comparison be done in an ASCII case-insensitive 
> manner or not? It might be helpful to clarify the spec in both places in 
> either case.

It is already case-insensitive as you lowercase the characters when 
creating the token name and when adding them to the buffer.


-- 
Geoffrey Sneddon - Opera Software
<http://gsnedders.com/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Reply via email to