On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Rob Ennals <[email protected]> wrote: > How about this for a solution for the localStorage mutex problem: > > "the user agent MAY release the storage mutex on *any* API operation except > localStorage itself" > > This guarantees that the common case of "several storage operations in a row > with nothing in-between" works, but gives the implementors the freedom to > release the storage mutex wherever else they find they need to.
How does it guarantee that? Can't the user agent release the mutex due to activity in another process/thread, between operations that are sequential in a given script? Mike
