Hmmm... Maybe it would be better to say ISO-646US rather than ASCII.
There is a lot of impreciseness about the very low value characters
(less than 0x20 space) in the ASCII "specifications." The same can be
said about the higher end.
===
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Yuzo Fujishima wrote:
I see both "US-ASCII" and "ASCII" are used in:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hixie-thewebsocketprotocol-54
If they mean the same thing, one should be used consistently.
In the document, US-ASCII seems to mean encoding while ASCII mean
charset. Is this common? (I guess US-ASCII is commonly considered as an
alias for ASCII. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII#Aliases )
I've changed the spec to use "ASCII" consistently.
Cheers,
