Given all of this info, does anyone believe there's further
investigation necessary before making a recommendation for this change?

-Nicholas
 
______________________________________________
Commander Lock: "Damnit Morpheus, not everyone believes what you
believe!"
Morpheus: "My beliefs do not require them to."

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Simon Pieters
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 2:30 AM
To: Nicholas Zakas; Jonas Sicking
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak; [email protected]; Aryeh Gregor
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Inconsistent behavior for empty-string URLs

On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:03:01 +0100, Nicholas Zakas
<[email protected]>  
wrote:

> Here are the results of testing various tags with empty URLs across
> different browsers. The table below indicates how many requests are
sent
> when the given tag is encountered on the page (curiously, Firefox 3
> sometimes sends two extra requests). Even though the <link> tags don't
> show it in the table, they all had href="".
>
>                                       IE7     IE8     FF3     FF3.5
> SF4   Ch3     Op10
> <img src="">                  1       1       1       0       1
> 1     0
> <link rel="stylesheet">               0       0       1       1
1
> 1     0
> <link rel="icon">                     0       0       2       1
> 1     1       0
> <link rel="shortcut icon">    0       0       2       1       1
> 1     0
> <link rel="prefetch">         0       0       2       0       0
> 0     0
> <script src="">                       0       0       1       1
1
> 1     0
> <iframe src="">                       0       0       0       0
0
> 0     0
> <input type="image" src="">   1       1       1       0       1
> 1     0
> <object data="">                      0       0       1       1
> 0     0       0
> <embed src="">                        0       0       0       0
0
> 0     0
> <html manifest="">            0       0       0       0       1
> 0     0
>
> For the most part, no two browsers act the same. Safari and Chrome are
> the closest (not surprising).
>
> Apply a base URL via <base> in all cases didn't change the results,
> except in IE, where it prevented the extra image request from being
> made.

Thanks. IIRC, IE doesn't make a request when using minimized attribute  
syntax, i.e. "<img src>" (because it drops the attribute during
parsing).

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software

Reply via email to