Lachlan Hunt wrote:
Kornel Lesinski wrote:
However, if we're going to introduce token-based sandbox anyway, I
suggest putting token in tag name:

<sandbox-$token>...</sandbox-$token>

where $token is the random part. This avoids oddity of attributes in
closing tag, and is compatible with XML. In XML you could also use:

<$token:sandbox xmlns:$token="…"></$token:sandbox>

No, you couldn't use a namespace like that, because then the sandbox
element would not be in the HTML namespace, and thus would not have any
known semantics.

Um, ignore me.  I'm just not thinking properly today.

--
Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software
http://lachy.id.au/
http://www.opera.com/

Reply via email to