On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalm...@gmail.com> wrote: > All of these cases appear to be an ASP or PHP page that is > accidentally being sent as ordinary html. You shouldn't be seeing > these tags at all in the source of the page unless a server is > misconfigured.
At least in one page I saw, which was Case 1 and page was originally from a JSP or ASP template later modified and saved as a *.html On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote: > So the currently-specified behavior in fact matches the observed Firefox > behavior (with either parser) on these simple testcases. So will IE and Safari (may be chrome also, i have not tested it) follow Firefox way? Personally I prefer the IE way as I think one may able to make a simple PHP or JSP editor just using contentEditable feature.