On 2010-03-17 17:28, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>/ I'm wondering if data-* attributes should be renamed to priv-* to make
/>>/ it clearer that it's page's _private_ data.
/>>/
/>>/ "data-" is such a nice generic prefix that I'm afraid sooner or later
/>>/ someone will start basing microformats-like markup on that.
/>/
/>/ It's not a bad idea... Unfortunately data-* is already being used quite a
/>/ lot and has been widely advertised, so we have to be careful with this.
/>/ Anyone else have an opinion on this?
/
I don't feel strongly that either name is better. Though I would not
that priv- doesn't make things much clearer since it's totally
undefined who it's private to.
Maybe a better naming would have been: doc-*
It's short, it kinda reflect what it's related to as well right? Or does
that clash with something?
Regards,
Roger.
--
Roger "Rescator" Hågensen.
Freelancer - http://EmSai.net/
