How is that productive? I realize that it's meant as a joke but it does nothing but add to the impression that some in the WHATWG community just don't care about civility, respect, and cooperation.
The best thing to counteract that impression is to prove it wrong. On Jun 25, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Perry Smith wrote: > On Jun 25, 2010, at 5:13 AM, Doug Schepers wrote: > >> There are a few possible ways to handle this: >> 1) W3C could match the WHATWG version in all details, with all decisions >> made by WHATWG >> 2) WHATWG could match the W3C version in all details, with all decisions >> made by W3C >> 3) WHATWG and W3C could maintain different specs with different details, and >> list the differences with an explanation for each >> 4) WHATWG and W3C could adopt decisions made in each group, and where there >> is conflict, decide upon some method of settling the difference of opinion. > 5) W3C could go away
