Is it easier in terms of implementation issues or general consensus? -Nicholas ______________________________________________ Commander Lock: "Dammit Morpheus, not everyone believes what you believe!" Morpheus: "My beliefs do not require them to."
-----Original Message----- From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 5:51 PM To: Nicholas Zakas Cc: Scott Hess; Alexandre Morgaut; [email protected]; Jeremy Orlow Subject: Re: [whatwg] Proposal for Web Storage expiration On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Nicholas Zakas <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, for IndexDB I think having a per-storage area expiration date completely > makes sense. Do you expect that IndexedDB will become a successor to > sessionStorage/localStorage? My belief is that the simple key-value store > paradigm would still end up being the default client-side data storage > utility, and would therefore benefit from having a per-key expiration time to > mimic cookie usage. I suspect it will be much easier to add to IndexedDB than to localStorage/sessionStorage. I don't expect the latter to go away, though generally it seems like people are disliking localStorage enough that it's hard to get any changes made to it. / Jonas
