On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Ian Hickson <[email protected]> wrote: > > (This is presumably slightly off-topic, for which I apologise. I've set > follow-ups to the WHATWG list.) > > On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > > > However I've looked at what Ian is up to recently, and I think that > > > TTML could map fairly well into his evolving architecture, so all we > > > need to make sure is that he doesn't explicitly rule it out. > > > > I also would prefer to keep the <track> platform open to any file > > format. > > The <track> element as specced in the WHATWG HTML spec is intended to be > format-agnostic. If there's anything that implies otherwise, please send > feedback to the WHATWG list. (There may already be such feedback, in which > case I will correct the problem in a few weeks when I get to that mail; > right now I'm going through mail from around April.)
Hi Ian, thanks for clarifying this - I guess because WebSRT is specified inside HTML5 in WHATWG I assumed it was only open for WebSRT, and because the rendering is also only specified based on WebSRT features, that confirmed that assumption. I have indeed sent much feedback on WHATWG, some of which are certain to be misunderstandings that need clarification. Looking forward to moving it along! Cheers, Silvia.
