On 26.08.2010 22:10, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Julian Reschke<[email protected]> wrote:
Not convinced. There's already one way to escape these things, and this is
supported in all UAs.
Adam gave two examples of cases where htmlspecialchars() is
insufficient, even if authors do use it. This proposal is completely
general and will work anywhere, even in<script>. Is automated
general escaping even possible right now in<script> for text/html?
OK, sorry for my multiple posts.
I now get the point about the additional problems in script, but I fail
to see how the proposal addresses this, unless expanding these entities
is suppose to happen *after* parsing the script.
Best regards, Julian
