|
I tried out local storage,
used it to save the contents of a content-editable passage. It worked
great in Firefox, Chrome, Safari, and MSIE. Only one problem: Every
time I switched browsers, I had to start over with the original
unedited passage. So I have two requests. 1. I would like the browser vendors to all use the same implementation of localStorage, as this will greatly facilitate browser-independent viewing experiences. As it stands, I have no idea how to maintain continuity if a user viewing my page in one browser switches to another browser. None. 2. Kindly extend the specification so that other applications can make constructive use of localStorage. Specifically, (a) establish a convention for associating keys with particular files (e.g., by prepending the file's path name to the key), and (b) allowing other applications to treat the file and its associated local storage as a single entity. Doing this would allow a user to e-mail the current state of a file to a friend, so that both will have the same view of the file. This ability to share "current" views of a file is useful for maintaining HTML's role as a communications vehicle. Jim Williams |
- [whatwg] Web Storage, Editor's Draft 20 August 2010 - Reque... Jim Williams
- Re: [whatwg] Web Storage, Editor's Draft 20 August 201... Tab Atkins Jr.
- Re: [whatwg] Web Storage, Editor's Draft 20 August... Jim Williams
- Re: [whatwg] Web Storage, Editor's Draft 20 Au... Eric Uhrhane
- Re: [whatwg] Web Storage, Editor's Draft 2... Jeremy Orlow
- Re: [whatwg] Web Storage, Editor's Draft 20 August 201... Eric Uhrhane
- Re: [whatwg] Web Storage, Editor's Draft 20 August 201... Aryeh Gregor
