This thread has in fact already received an "official" reply:
I am sorry, I didn't recognize you were one of the "managers" here.
I should've read more.
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-August/028148.html
That e-mail received a reply that I haven't responded to yet:
http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2010-August/028182.html
Strange, I didn't see this reply. I might have overlooked it, sorry.
E-mails sent to the WHATWG list eventually get a reply from me, at which
point, if appropriate, I edit the spec.
Alright! I just wondered if there were any extra steps required.
For more details, please see the FAQ:
http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ
I should have read it.
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Julian Reschke wrote:
If you want this to be tracked, you should open a ticket in the W3C bug
tracker.
That's unnecessary; I guarantee that I will read and reply to every
e-mail
sent to this mailing list that provides new feedback. All pending e-mails
are tracked here:
http://www.whatwg.org/issues/
Alright, but I didn't see the answer or my proposal here..?
(This is also why there's no point sending messages that don't introduce
new information, [...] -- I ignore those e-mails so they can't affect
the spec.)
I understand.
HTH,
