> Interesting. I'm pretty sure I've seen pages that would break as a > result... I guess we'll see when a browser tries to do that.
from memory, microb did things like this, and it did break sites :). such breakage is unfortunate, and the lack of flexibility/ability for browser vendors to innovate is unfortunate. > The problem with breaking scripts is that it might cause a UA to not be able > to ship the feature at all if it breaks existing content. That's why the > risk of breaking scripts is pretty important (my UA developer's hat on, > etc). indeed. personally, i'd favor the content developer use <select> (as mentioned repeatedly in this thread).
