On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 12:33 -0800, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Ashley Sheridan > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Would <aside> be more contextually accurate in the case of user-generated > > comments? I was of the understanding that <aside> elements were content > > that was related to the main <article> but not necessarily part of it. > > The opposite, actually. <aside> indicates things that are *un*related > to the main content, or only tangentially related. That's why it's > appropriate for things like sidebars on a blog, or pull-quotes in an > article. > > ~TJ
Ah, my bad then, I thought it was intended as a sort of boxout thing like you might find in a magazine. Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk
