On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 18:56:56 +0100, Simon Pieters <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 16:57:50 +0100, Philip Jägenstedt
<[email protected]> wrote:
To use a different style for the cues that are sung together, so that
you know when it's your turn to sing.
It's not clear whether multiple voices is really necessary. Can't you
just
do (using the new syntax):
00:01.000 --> 00:02.000
<v Bob> Speaker 1
00:03.000 --> 00:04.000
<v Jim> Speaker 2
00:05.000 --> 00:06.000
<v Bob and Jim> Speaker 1+2
...where "Bob and Jim" is a third name?
Sure, one could, but the new syntax/parsing also allows <v Bob><v Jim>
Speaker 1+2, which is what I requested.
Using this syntax, I would expect some confusion when you omit the
closing </v>, when it's *not* a cue spoken by two voices at the same
time, such as:
<v Jim>- Boo!
<v Bob>- Gah!
Gah! is spoken by both Jim and Bob, but that was likely not intended.
If this causes confusion, we should make validators warn about multiple
voices with with no closing </v>.
Or we can say that nesting cues is not important enough to be supported,
and make <v> imply </v>?
Yes, that would be another solution.
--
Philip Jägenstedt
Core Developer
Opera Software
