On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 01:12:21 +0100, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:28:12 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Feb 26, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Michael Nordman wrote:
Sure, but a better name could help a bit. For example, this produces
a 'shared' object:
document.getElementById("foo")
while this creates a new one:
myFormElement.getFormData()
It might be ok, but it is a bit inconsistent.
Why not:
formData = new FormData();
formData = new FormData(myFormElement);
ah... +1 the ctor
Indeed, constructor syntax makes it very clear that you are getting a
new object. I like.
I could add this to XMLHttpRequest Level 2.
Just to close this thread in my inbox. This thread moved over to
public-webapps where I finally followed up with something tangible:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/0416.html
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
