On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Nicholas Zakas <[email protected]> wrote: > That being said, I think we're going a bit off-track now. Both Kyle's and my > proposals are based on already-existing functionality that we know doesn't > break the web (code hacks aside). We'd both like to formalize that behavior > in some way so that we can make better use of it. We should really be > discussing whether any of the proposals are worth pursuing to any degree.
Can you comment on the issues I raised? I found the potential benefits of an execute() call substantial; without it, the case for readyState seems more compelling (though I need to review the feature detection question in more depth). Also, again, your example code doesn't work the way it looks like it's intended to, since successCallback will be called before the loaded scripts have actually been executed. -- Glenn Maynard
