On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:48 PM, David Hyatt <hy...@apple.com> wrote:
> Do you actually mean try out both ":scope" tacked on to the end of the rule
> as well as ":scope " (note the space indicating a descendant selector) tacked
> on to the beginning?
>
> So for example, #foo { } would turn into #foo:scope, :scope #foo { } thus
> allowing it to match either the scope or a descendant of the scope?
No, it's an if/else. "#foo" would be equivalent to ":scope #foo". On
the other hand, "#foo :scope" would be unaltered.
~TJ