On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Ralph Giles <[email protected]> wrote: > On 21/09/11 04:04 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >> I have an additional point. Can we maybe consider naming it just "VTT"? >> At least as far as file signatures, media types, and other >> developer-facing identifiers are concerned. > > Three ASCII characters is a little sparse for a file signature. Otherwise, I > don't object.
The mime type is already text/vtt, so nothing to worry about there. Whether you want to call it "VTT" or "WebVTT" is up to you. The file signature should indeed stay longer and I do quite like WEBVTT for that. Cheers, Silvia.
