On 10/6/11 5:54 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Boris Zbarsky<[email protected]>  wrote:
A meta-issue: if you disagree with the spec text when implementing
something, silently implementing something else seems strictly worse than
raising a spec issue (and still implementing something else if desired).

I didn't knowingly diverge from the spec.

Ah, ok. My apologies, then. The argument here was sounding like the difference from the spec was on purpose...

-Boris

Reply via email to