On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 05:07:18 +0900, Ryosuke Niwa <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Ehsan Akhgari <[email protected]> wrote:
This sounds reasonable. The content attribute should be made
non-conforming in that case. Perhaps the IDL attribute should throw
on setting? Maybe better to just do nothing, but that doesn't give
the author any idea of what's wrong.
Right.
FWIW, I think we should throw in this case.
Suggestions on which exception to throw?
Given that you could just set the content attribute instead, throwing for
the IDL attribute makes little sense to me. It seems better to just let it
function per its normal rules and have any such attributes be
non-conforming and ignored.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
