Re: [whatwg] iframe sandbox, Boris Zbarsky Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:52:58 -0800 On 11/9/11 9:25 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: It seems wrong to me to add new features to obsoleted features. If there are good reasons for using <frame>, maybe it should be made conforming. If there are no such reasons, there are no reasons either for adding new features to it. Well, there's implementation and conceptual simplicity. Saying that @sandbox works for all browsing contexts is a lot simpler than saying it works for a particular white- or black-list of tag names. -Boris Previous message View by thread View by date Next message [whatwg] iframe sandbox, <object tag> Ian Melven Re: [whatwg] iframe sandbox, <object tag> Adam Barth Re: [whatwg] iframe sandbox, <object tag> Jonas Sicking Re: [whatwg] iframe sandbox, <object tag... Adam Barth Re: [whatwg] iframe sandbox, <object... Ian Melven Re: [whatwg] iframe sandbox, <object tag> Anne van Kesteren Re: [whatwg] iframe sandbox, <object tag> Boris Zbarsky Re: [whatwg] iframe sandbox, <object tag... Anne van Kesteren Re: [whatwg] iframe sandbox, <object... Ian Hickson Reply via email to Search the site The Mail Archive home whatwg - all messages whatwg - about the list Expand Previous message Next message The Mail Archive home Add your mailing list FAQ Support Privacy 4EBABDEB.7010706@mit.edu

[Boris Zbarsky]

On 11/9/11 9:25 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
It seems wrong to me to add new features to obsoleted features. If there
are good reasons for using <frame>, maybe it should be made conforming.
If there are no such reasons, there are no reasons either for adding new
features to it.

Well, there's implementation and conceptual simplicity.  Saying that 
@sandbox works for all browsing contexts is a lot simpler than saying it 
works for a particular white- or black-list of tag names.

-Boris