On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Jonas Sicking <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I actually think it's actively bad to converge on having the same >> interface for automatic and manual transaction. The two work in >> dramatically different ways. The code that goes into the "apply" >> function of a automatic transaction has dramatically different meaning >> than the code that goes into the "apply" function for a manual >> transaction since the UA records the actions of the former and stores >> them away. > > > Okay. I'm actually renaming apply, unapply, reapply to execute, undo, and > redo. So how about "automaticExecute"?
Works for me. (I don't care that strongly about the actual names, as long as they are different between the two types). / Jonas
