On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 12/14/11 8:05 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > it was with respect to<nobr>, which we now > > define in terms of 'white-space'. > > Maybe that needs to change?
How else would we define it? Whether it's <wbr> or <nobr> that gets defined in terms that violate CSS, the result is the same as far as I can tell. If we make a change here it seems better to move towards just specifying everything in terms of CSS, e.g. as the suggestion in my last e-mail on this thread. The question really is whether that CSS-only solution is a plausible way forward or if it has problems I haven't thought of. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
