Hi, thank you for quick reply,
(2012/01/09 0:38), Lin Jen-Shin (godfat) wrote: > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:20 PM, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote: >> (2012/01/08 23:32), Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 01:37:14 +0100, NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> = Legacy multi-octet Chinese (traditional) encodings >>>> >>>> Mozilla supports another Big5 variants, Big5-UAO. >>>> http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/1784 >>> >>> As part of the big5 encoding, right? It sounds like it's a good idea to >>> adopt that. I don't think there's much concern about table size these days, >>> though obviously the less complexity the better. >> >> CC to the original reporter. >> Could you cooperate about current situation in Taiwan? > > I am not sure what I can do here, but I would try my best to > coordinate if there's anything I could help. > > So what are we trying to solve here, again? This is the thread from http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-December/034241.html And discussing about a spec about Encoding on the web. http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/encoding/raw-file/tip/Overview.html I'm interesting about whether web browsers other than Mozilla should implement Big5-UAO or not. Thanks, -- NARUSE, Yui <[email protected]>
