I'm also late in this discussion but followed it globally. Maybe a structure like Microdata's itemref="" is an option too.

You could do:

<img src="default.jpg" alt="An image" srcref="placeholder img1-a img1-b img1-c"> <img src="default2.jpg" alt="Another image" srcref="placeholder img2-a img2-b img2-c">

<src href="placeholder.jpg" id="placeholder" media="max-width:320px">

<src href="small.jpg" id="img1-a" media="min-width:320px">
<src href="medium.jpg" id="img1-b" media="min-width:720px">
<src href="large.jpg" id="img1-c" media="min-width:1200px">

<src href="small2.jpg" id="img2-a" media="min-width:320px">
<src href="medium2.jpg" id="img2-b" media="min-width:720px">
<src href="large2.jpg" id="img2-c" media="min-width:1200px">

This gives you the ability to share the sources with multiple img elements. For example when you have a placeholder image for devices that you do not support.

Tim

On Feb 8, 2012, at 7:29 PM, Jason Grigsby wrote:

On Feb 8, 2012, at 8:54 AM, FOUSHEE, SEAN wrote:

I'm late to this discussion so pardon me if this has already been discussed, by using the same 
logic as the<srclist>  why not just create<figlist>  to go along with 
the<figure>  element?


When a bunch of us discussed this on an etherpad a while back, we ruled<figure> 
 out because:

* Completely redefines semantics and content model of an already new element.
* Current use includes multiple images
* Current use includes non-images like code samples, video, etc.

https://etherpad.mozilla.org/responsive-assets

Of course, this doesn’t mean we were right about ruling it out. :-)

-Jason


Thanks for the clarification.

The fact that the<figure>  element is structured to allow us to define multiple 
images seems like a good fit for this approach, especially since it's going to end up 
using the new tag(s) anyway if the page needs to group multiple responsive images 
together:

<figure>
<img src="default1.jpg" alt="" list="firstimage">
<srclist id="firstimage">
<source href="small1.jpg" media="min-width:320px">
<source href="medium1.jpg" media="min-width:720px">
<source href="fullsize1.jpg" media="min-width:1200px">
</srclist>
<img src="default2.jpg" alt="" list="secondimage">
<srclist id="secondimage">
<source href="small2.jpg" media="min-width:320px">
<source href="medium2.jpg" media="min-width:720px">
<source href="fullsize2.jpg" media="min-width:1200px">
</srclist>
<!-- etc etc etc -->
<figcaption>Multiple responsive images grouped in the figure 
element</figcaption>
</figure>

But I agree with David that this feels very bloated, and honestly I'd hate to think 
of the things my students would throw at me if I were to present this as the approach 
to handle responsive images in HTML. It's bad enough we have to encode and serve up 
at least three different video formats with a possible fallback just to utilize 
the<video>  tag, but to do this for every image would be a nightmare.

Sean Fousheé
Instructor, Graphic Communications
Tarrant County College, NE Campus
828 Harwood Rd.
Hurst, TX 76054
(817) 515.6596
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



Reply via email to