"Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorp...@cs.tut.fi> schrieb am Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:19:02 +0200:
> […] > The difference between <blockquote> and (for example) <quotation> as > quotation markup is that the latter has no burden of existing use for > other purposes. By analogy, a completely new table element would also be necessary. Oh, and what about a way to denote images that is not tarnished by spacer GIFs and web bugs? > Anyone who plans to do some intelligent processing of > quotations could expect <quotation> to be quotation markup and > nothing else, since there is no motivation for using it for other > purposes Authors lie and we will have to live with it. You cannot make content producers honest by just introducing a new element intended to be used similar to the old element. Why do you think that *this* time, everyone will read the manual before producing markup? -- Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
