On Friday, March 30, 2012, Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Ian Hickson <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > Jonas is correct. Since there was no interop here I figured we might as > > well go with what made sense. > > I'm somewhat unhappy about fixing IE-introduced APIs to "make sense" > like this. The implementation in Gecko isn't particularly good. When > trying to make it better, I discovered that doing what IE did would > have lead to simpler code. >
That's not a particularly strong argument. The question is what's better for authors. / Jonas
