On May 10, 2012, at 6:24 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > That all said, I don't like the "2x" notation. It's declaring "this > image's resolution is twice that of a normal image". This has two > problems. For one, we already have a unit that means that - the dppx > unit. Using "2dppx" is identical to the meaning of "2x". Since > image-set() is newer than the dppx unit, we should change it to use > <resolution> instead. "dppx" has the downside that not even CSS Working Group members can consistently spell it correctly. Regards, Maciej
