On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Jason Grigsby <[email protected]> wrote:
> It may be that the proposal is written in language that implementors 
> understand and that it needs to be rewritten to make it clearer for authors 
> how it would work. Or it could be an indication that the syntax is too terse 
> and confusing for authors (which is currently the feedback the community 
> group is receiving).

Some people seem to think the filenames are part of the syntax. Using
filenames that don't duplicate information in the syntax might
actually be less confusing:

  <img src="a.jpg" alt=""
        set="a.jpg 600w 200h 1x,
               b.jpg 600w 200h 2x,
               c.jpg 200w 200h">

Perhaps changing the syntax to avoid confusion with units might help too:

  <img src="a.jpg" alt=""
        set="a.jpg 600x200 1x,
                b.jpg 600x200 2x,
                c.jpg 200x200">

--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis

Reply via email to