On May 16, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Jonas Sicking <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I agree that there's no obligation. And I agree that if people here > didn't know about the existence of the CG then of course it's not > surprising that we didn't engage with the work that was happening > there. > > However I was under the impression that that wasn't the situation > here. So while I agree that there was no obligation, it also doesn't > seem surprising to me that the people in the CG were unhappy/upset > with the resulting outcome. I didn't know about the respimg CG until a few days ago (after a couple of days of discussion of responsive image proposals, and months after Ted first posted his image-set proposal to www-style). Checking after the fact, I could find no mention of the term "respimg" or anything else uniquely identifying the community group in the archives of [email protected] or public-html, and no one from the CG that I asked had a recollection of announcing it here. That's the basis for my assumption that most people here didn't know about the CG while it was working on its proposal. Do you have a basis for assuming otherwise? REgards, Maciej
