On Thu, 24 May 2012 23:02:00 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <[email protected]> wrote:


I agree. Even though there are still legacy features like cookies and document.domain that use domain-based security, most of the Web platform uses origin-based security, and that has proved to be a sounder model. While I acknowledge the use cases for exposing location.domain, it's also likely to become an attractive nuisance that pulls developers in the wrong direction.


Although I understand this opinion and agree with it, the domain based security checks are used for cross frame interaction, cookies, security certificates, etc, therefore it has to be specified and documented.

I don't think adding a location.tld property or location.topDomain would pull developers away from anything. It would just make the legacy domain based security checks a bit more easy to handle and understand. It's the specifications and APIs that tell which security model to use, not the developer.

Reply via email to