ah ok, yes, it seems that we misunderstood - thanks for the clarification !

ian


----- Original Message -----
From: "Anne van Kesteren" <[email protected]>
To: "Ian Melven" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 7:14:09 AM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] sandboxed documents and cookies

On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Ian Melven <[email protected]> wrote:
> IE 10, Chrome and the patches I am working on for Firefox all throw a 
> SecurityError
> even if no cookies are set - i agree that this seems like the correct 
> behaviour.

It seems you misunderstand the term cookie-free Document object. It's
a specific kind of Document object, used by XMLHttpRequest (and maybe
ought to be used for DOMParser and such too).

I believe from testing the behavior for XMLHttpRequest is different in
browsers from throwing, although I would prefer if they were
consistent there.


-- 
Anne — Opera Software
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/

Reply via email to