@Ryosuke - I do not have a concrete proposal but would be interested in helping to work one out. I had idly considered a content attribute but think that specifying an element (perhaps via a function called setDragElement()) would be a simple implementation.
@Daniel - I had thought that was possible but in my testing I was not able to get it to work. I had tried referencing an existing element as well as creating a new element but neither were visible while dragging [in Chrome]. On Friday, June 29, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Daniel Cheng wrote: > Can't you use setDragImage() and pass it the element that holds the post > title? > > Daniel > > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Alex Bain <[email protected] > > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > I would prefer not to visually drag the entire post around (which is what > > > happens if I set draggable to true on the post container). My goal is to > > > set draggable on a container element and only show a small element when > > > the user starts dragging. > > > > Ah, that's an interesting use case. Thanks for clarification. Do you have a > > concrete proposal for this? (e.g. adding new content attribute / element). > > > > - Ryosuke > > >
