Le 25/07/2012 15:32, Bronislav Klučka a écrit :
And my last remark: I hope major browser vendors will chose to follow
the same path, the same implementation of tasks, but not all major
vendors are part of WHATWG (as far as I know), and if some choose to
follow W3C and some different WHATWG drafts of the same task, what
would happen?
A last point I forgot. Since there is one web, since urls (usually)
refer to the same content, all web browsers are tied together to all
render the content, no matter what their standards
belonging/non-belonging/preference is.
From the implementor perspective, what's important isn't standards by
themselves, but supporting this existing (and hopefully upcoming) content.
There is still a need to shift the perception of what a "standard"
actually means in the context of the web. It is my understanding that
when Hixie shifted to the "living standard" model, one of the goal was
to start this shift of perception. There is still a long way to go.
David
