On 08/14/2012 03:03 AM, Sebastian Zartner wrote:
* One for all elements representing possible drop targets that could receive the item. * One for all elements representing drop targets that do not accept this type of item.This sounds like these two pseudo-classes would do exactly the opposite. So why not use :not() for this case?
That question was asked and answered here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Sep/0417.html Apparently an invalid dropzone is one that accepts drops, but not of this type, so it's not exactly the same as :not(:valid-drop). I'm unsure if it's necessary to add at this point, but can add it and mark at-risk for the time being. ~fantasai
