On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Ian Hickson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does it work if you just transform all the points and the line?
(Yeah, that's still way too vague. I'm not sure how to really specify > this in a manner that's both unambiguous and clear. Any suggestions?) > > I am not 100% sure that this is what you are trying to say, but how about this: The transform that is current when the path is closed applies to the entire path.
