On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Charles Pritchard <[email protected]> wrote: > I wanted vendors to solidify consensus on a version close to what currently > exists, with minor changes for accessibility. The WHATWG and W3C have chosen > instead to make broad changes, as proposed in version 5/the Hixie-Atkins > draft.
Out of curiosity, why are you using the term "the Hixie-Atkins draft"? That usage seems bizarre. ~TJ
