On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:46:36 +0100, Simon Pieters <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:40:57 +0100, Steve Faulkner
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Anne,
That feedback as stated was mainly for Hixie, who dismissed it.
I have sought further opinion, but do not have the expertise to know
what I
need to do with it.
for example, I get the sense that implementers in general do not want to
mess with the parsing algorithm, so does that mean. I don't need to put
anything in the spec?
That's right.
OTOH, if we wanted <main> to parse like <aside>, we'd add "main" to:
[[
A start tag whose tag name is one of: "address", "article", "aside",
"blockquote", "center", "details", "dialog", "dir", "div", "dl",
"fieldset", "figcaption", "figure", "footer", "header", "hgroup", "menu",
"nav", "ol", "p", "section", "summary", "ul"
]]
and:
[[
An end tag whose tag name is one of: "address", "article", "aside",
"blockquote", "button", "center", "details", "dialog", "dir", "div", "dl",
"fieldset", "figcaption", "figure", "footer", "header", "hgroup",
"listing", "menu", "nav", "ol", "pre", "section", "summary", "ul"
]]
in
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/tree-construction.html#parsing-main-inbody
--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
